AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best coffee maker for office

Breville takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 12 ranked brands, only 3 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The best coffee machines for offices in 2026, tested and reviewed | Popular Sciencewww.popsci.compopsci.com/gear/best-coffee-machin…s/?utm=airanks.net164
K-2550™ Medium Business Coffee Maker - Plumbed | Keurig Commercialcommercial.keurig.comcommercial.keurig.com/pdp/pdp/Comm…er?utm=airanks.net114
the Luxe Brewer™ Thermal | Breville (US)www.breville.combreville.com/en-us/product/bdc465?utm=airanks.net92
Drip Coffee Maker with Thermal Carafe | Breville (US)www.breville.combreville.com/en-us/product/bdc450?utm=airanks.net73
VPR with 2 Glass Decanters (1 Upper/1 Lower Warmer) - Coffee - BUNN Commercial Sitecommercial.bunn.comcommercial.bunn.com/33200.0015?utm=airanks.net57
K-2500 ™ Brewer Use & Care Guide Get the Most Fromdam.keurig.comdam.keurig.com/content/dam/public-…df?utm=airanks.net42
CWTF15-TC Thermal Carafe System - Coffee - BUNN Commercial Sitecommercial.bunn.comcommercial.bunn.com/12950.0360?utm=airanks.net34
Best Office Coffee Machine 2026: 7 Tested Picks by Team Sizecoffeebrewshub.comcoffeebrewshub.com/blog/best-offic…es?utm=airanks.net33
K-2550™ Medium Business Coffee Maker - Pour Over Water Reservoir | Keurig Commercialcommercial.keurig.comcommercial.keurig.com/pdp/Commerci…er?utm=airanks.net29
Series 5500 Fully automatic espresso machine EP5544/90 | Philipswww.usa.philips.comusa.philips.com/c-p/EP5544_90/seri…ne?utm=airanks.net29

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Breville locked Breville — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=409 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 69% of answers
Keurig locked Keurig — ci 0.91–0.91 · n=409 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 89% of answers
Technivorm locked Technivorm — ci 0.82–0.82 · n=409 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 35% of answers
Philips soft Philips — ci 0.64–0.73 · n=409 · 66.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 12% of answers
OXO contested OXO — ci 0.55–0.73 · n=409 · 58.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Ninja unsettled Ninja — ci 0.36–0.64 · n=409 · 41.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Cuisinart unsettled Cuisinart — ci 0.36–0.55 · n=409 · 33.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
JURA unsettled JURA — ci 0.36–0.55 · n=409 · 36.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Nespresso contested Nespresso — ci 0.00–0.27 · n=409 · 46.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 1% of answers
Braun gathering Braun — gathering data, n=409. No bootstrap interval yet.
Zojirushi gathering Zojirushi — gathering data, n=409. No bootstrap interval yet.
Fellow gathering Fellow — gathering data, n=409. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Breville

1.00–1.00

Keurig

0.91–0.91

Technivorm

0.82–0.82

Philips

0.64–0.73

OXO

0.55–0.73

Ninja

0.36–0.64

Cuisinart

0.36–0.55

JURA

0.36–0.55

Nespresso

0.00–0.27

9 of 12 brands measured · 11 dominance edges · 6 rungs · 8 pairs the data does not separate