AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best crm tools for small business

Zoho takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 14 ranked brands, only 9 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Streamline Your Entire Business With a Free CRM | HubSpotwww.hubspot.comhubspot.com/products/crm?utm=airanks.net183
CRM Pricing Plans | Affordable CRM Software Costs | Pipedrivewww.pipedrive.compipedrive.com/en/pricing?utm=airanks.net170
Freshsales CRM Pricing Comparison | Freshsaleswww.freshworks.comfreshworks.com/crm/pricing-compare/?utm=airanks.net133
Free Tools | HubSpotwww.hubspot.comhubspot.com/pricing/crm?utm=airanks.net115
Freshsales Pricing & Plans | Freshworkswww.freshworks.comfreshworks.com/crm/pricing/?utm=airanks.net102
Zoho CRM Pricing and Editions - Free for 3 userswww.zoho.comzoho.com/crm/zohocrm-pricing.html?utm=airanks.net89
monday.com pricing and plansmonday.commonday.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net86
CRM Pricing Plans | Affordable CRM Software Costs | Pipedrivewww.pipedrive.compipedrive.com/en/pricing/professio…rm?utm=airanks.net82
monday.com CRM pricing: find the plan that works for youmonday.commonday.com/crm/pricing?utm=airanks.net79
Free Pricing Calculator | Zoho CRMwww.zoho.comzoho.com/crm/zohocrm-pricing-calcu…ml?utm=airanks.net66

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Zoho locked Zoho — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=388 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 99% of answers
Pipedrive locked Pipedrive — ci 0.92–0.92 · n=388 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
Freshsales locked Freshsales — ci 0.85–0.85 · n=388 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 93% of answers
Monday.com locked Monday.com — ci 0.77–0.77 · n=388 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 72% of answers
Salesforce locked Salesforce — ci 0.69–0.69 · n=388 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 62% of answers
Less Annoying CRM locked Less Annoying CRM — ci 0.54–0.62 · n=388 · 97.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 20% of answers
HubSpot locked HubSpot — ci 0.54–0.62 · n=388 · 97.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Insightly locked Insightly — ci 0.38–0.46 · n=388 · 97.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Keap firm Keap — ci 0.23–0.46 · n=388 · 86.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
Close CRM contested Close CRM — ci 0.00–0.38 · n=388 · 46.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 1% of answers
Copper gathering Copper — gathering data, n=388. No bootstrap interval yet.
Microsoft Dynamics gathering Microsoft Dynamics — gathering data, n=388. No bootstrap interval yet.
Capsule gathering Capsule — gathering data, n=388. No bootstrap interval yet.
GoHighLevel gathering GoHighLevel — gathering data, n=388. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Zoho

1.00–1.00

Pipedrive

0.92–0.92

Freshsales

0.85–0.85

Monday.com

0.77–0.77

Salesforce

0.69–0.69

Less Annoying CRM

0.54–0.62

HubSpot

0.54–0.62

Insightly

0.38–0.46

Keap

0.23–0.46

Close CRM

0.00–0.38

10 of 14 brands measured · 12 dominance edges · 7 rungs · 4 pairs the data does not separate