AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best email marketing platform 2026

Brevo takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 11 ranked brands, only 7 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Klaviyo Pricing Plans | Get Started with Email & SMSwww.klaviyo.comklaviyo.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net187
Simple, Transparent Pricing - MailerLitewww.mailerlite.commailerlite.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net148
Flexible Pricing Plans for Every Stage of Your Creator Businesskit.comkit.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net117
Mailchimp Pricing Plans | Get Started Today | Mailchimpmailchimp.commailchimp.com/pricing/marketing/?utm=airanks.net114
Creator Plan vs Creator Pro Plan | Kit Help Centerhelp.kit.comhelp.kit.com/en/articles/4494683-c…an?utm=airanks.net105
Pricing - beehiiv — The newsletter platform built for growthwww.beehiiv.combeehiiv.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net97
The 8 best email marketing platforms in 2026: Expert tested | TechRadarwww.techradar.comtechradar.com/best/best-email-mark…re?utm=airanks.net84
Mailchimp Review: Pros & Cons, Features, Ratings, Pricing and morewww.techradar.comtechradar.com/reviews/mailchimp?utm=airanks.net80

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Brevo locked Brevo — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=366 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 94% of answers
Klaviyo locked Klaviyo — ci 0.90–0.90 · n=366 · 99.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 99% of answers
MailerLite locked MailerLite — ci 0.80–0.80 · n=366 · 99.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 50% of answers
Active Campaign soft Active Campaign — ci 0.60–0.70 · n=366 · 77.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 81% of answers
ConvertKit soft ConvertKit — ci 0.60–0.70 · n=366 · 77.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 90% of answers
Mailchimp locked Mailchimp — ci 0.50–0.50 · n=366 · 97.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 53% of answers
HubSpot locked HubSpot — ci 0.40–0.40 · n=366 · 99.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 84% of answers
beehiiv locked beehiiv — ci 0.30–0.30 · n=366 · 99.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 51% of answers
Omnisend locked Omnisend — ci 0.20–0.20 · n=366 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 12% of answers
Constant Contact gathering Constant Contact — gathering data, n=366. No bootstrap interval yet.
Sender gathering Sender — gathering data, n=366. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Brevo

1.00–1.00

Klaviyo

0.90–0.90

MailerLite

0.80–0.80

Active Campaign

0.60–0.70

ConvertKit

0.60–0.70

Mailchimp

0.50–0.50

HubSpot

0.40–0.40

beehiiv

0.30–0.30

Omnisend

0.20–0.20