AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best email marketing platform for newsletters

beehiiv takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 10 ranked brands, only 5 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Pricing - beehiiv — The newsletter platform built for growthwww.beehiiv.combeehiiv.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net277
The Kit Newsletter Plan | Kit Help Centerhelp.kit.comhelp.kit.com/en/articles/9053602-t…an?utm=airanks.net235
Simple, Transparent Pricing - MailerLitewww.mailerlite.commailerlite.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net204
Mailchimp Pricing Plans | Get Started Today | Mailchimpmailchimp.commailchimp.com/pricing/marketing/?utm=airanks.net159
About Brevo's pricing plans – Homehelp.brevo.comhelp.brevo.com/hc/en-us/articles/2…ns?utm=airanks.net108
How much does Substack cost? – Substack, Incsupport.substack.comsupport.substack.com/hc/en-us/arti…st?utm=airanks.net95
Flexible Pricing Plans for Every Stage of Your Creator Businesskit.comkit.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net65
Ghost(Pro) - Official managed hosting for Ghostghost.orgghost.org/pricing?utm=airanks.net40
TechRadarwww.techradar.comtechradar.com/reviews/mailchimp?utm=airanks.net34
Plan types and subscriber plan tier pricing – beehiivbeehiivhelp.zendesk.combeehiivhelp.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/a…ng?utm=airanks.net23

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

beehiiv locked beehiiv — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=371 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
MailerLite soft MailerLite — ci 0.78–0.89 · n=371 · 68.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 69% of answers
ConvertKit soft ConvertKit — ci 0.78–0.89 · n=371 · 68.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 96% of answers
Substack locked Substack — ci 0.67–0.67 · n=371 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 74% of answers
Mailchimp locked Mailchimp — ci 0.56–0.56 · n=371 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 58% of answers
Brevo locked Brevo — ci 0.44–0.44 · n=371 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 33% of answers
Klaviyo locked Klaviyo — ci 0.33–0.33 · n=371 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 13% of answers
Active Campaign soft Active Campaign — ci 0.00–0.22 · n=371 · 78.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Omnisend gathering Omnisend — gathering data, n=371. No bootstrap interval yet.
HubSpot gathering HubSpot — gathering data, n=371. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

beehiiv

1.00–1.00

MailerLite

0.78–0.89

ConvertKit

0.78–0.89

Substack

0.67–0.67

Mailchimp

0.56–0.56

Brevo

0.44–0.44

Klaviyo

0.33–0.33

Active Campaign

0.00–0.22

8 of 10 brands measured · 8 dominance edges · 7 rungs · 1 pair the data does not separate