AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best email marketing platforms

MailerLite takes the top spot in 98.4% of resamples. Of 12 ranked brands, only 10 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

About Brevo's pricing plans – Homehelp.brevo.comhelp.brevo.com/hc/en-us/articles/2…ns?utm=airanks.net204
Simple, Transparent Pricing - MailerLitewww.mailerlite.commailerlite.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net175
Klaviyo Pricing Plans | Get Started with Email & SMSwww.klaviyo.comklaviyo.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net140
Marketing Software Pricing | HubSpotwww.hubspot.comhubspot.com/pricing/marketing?utm=airanks.net113
Mailchimp Pricing Plans | Get Started Today | Mailchimpmailchimp.commailchimp.com/pricing/marketing/?utm=airanks.net111
Creator Plan vs Creator Pro Plan | Kit Help Centerhelp.kit.comhelp.kit.com/en/articles/4494683-c…an?utm=airanks.net88
Flexible Pricing Plans for Every Stage of Your Creator Businesskit.comkit.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net83
Omnisend Pricing Plans 2026 | Omnisend Help Centersupport.omnisend.comsupport.omnisend.com/en/articles/3…26?utm=airanks.net81
Best email marketing platform in 2026www.techradar.comtechradar.com/best/best-email-mark…re?utm=airanks.net80
HubSpot’s Marketing Hub pricing guide — AI-powered software for marketersblog.hubspot.comblog.hubspot.com/marketing/hubspot…ng?utm=airanks.net67

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

MailerLite locked MailerLite — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=365 · 98.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 81% of answers
Brevo locked Brevo — ci 0.91–0.91 · n=365 · 98.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
Klaviyo locked Klaviyo — ci 0.82–0.82 · n=365 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
ConvertKit locked ConvertKit — ci 0.73–0.73 · n=365 · 97.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 98% of answers
Mailchimp firm Mailchimp — ci 0.55–0.64 · n=365 · 89.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 86% of answers
Active Campaign firm Active Campaign — ci 0.55–0.64 · n=365 · 91.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 92% of answers
HubSpot locked HubSpot — ci 0.45–0.45 · n=365 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 95% of answers
Omnisend firm Omnisend — ci 0.27–0.36 · n=365 · 90.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 47% of answers
beehiiv firm beehiiv — ci 0.27–0.36 · n=365 · 90.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 40% of answers
Constant Contact locked Constant Contact — ci 0.18–0.18 · n=365 · 98.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
GetResponse gathering GetResponse — gathering data, n=365. No bootstrap interval yet.
Postmark gathering Postmark — gathering data, n=365. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

MailerLite

1.00–1.00

Brevo

0.91–0.91

Klaviyo

0.82–0.82

ConvertKit

0.73–0.73

Mailchimp

0.55–0.64

Active Campaign

0.55–0.64

HubSpot

0.45–0.45

Omnisend

0.27–0.36

beehiiv

0.27–0.36

Constant Contact

0.18–0.18

10 of 12 brands measured · 11 dominance edges · 8 rungs · 2 pairs the data does not separate