AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best email marketing platforms free

Brevo takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 14 ranked brands, only 10 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Simple, Transparent Pricing - MailerLitewww.mailerlite.commailerlite.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net209
FAQs - What are the limits of the Free plan? – Homehelp.brevo.comhelp.brevo.com/hc/en-us/articles/2…an?utm=airanks.net198
Mailchimp Pricing Plans | Get Started Today | Mailchimpmailchimp.commailchimp.com/pricing/marketing/?utm=airanks.net175
Free Email Marketing Service | Start Your Free Forever Plan Todaywww.sender.netsender.net/free-email-marketing/?utm=airanks.net87
Pricing - beehiiv — The newsletter platform built for growthwww.beehiiv.combeehiiv.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net77
Email Marketing Software & Free Campaign Tools | HubSpotwww.hubspot.comhubspot.com/products/marketing/email?utm=airanks.net73

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Brevo locked Brevo — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=365 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
MailerLite firm MailerLite — ci 0.85–0.92 · n=365 · 90.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 93% of answers
Sender firm Sender — ci 0.85–0.92 · n=365 · 89.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 56% of answers
ConvertKit locked ConvertKit — ci 0.77–0.77 · n=365 · 99.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 89% of answers
HubSpot locked HubSpot — ci 0.69–0.69 · n=365 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 71% of answers
Mailchimp locked Mailchimp — ci 0.62–0.62 · n=365 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 60% of answers
beehiiv locked beehiiv — ci 0.54–0.54 · n=365 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 30% of answers
EmailOctopus locked EmailOctopus — ci 0.38–0.46 · n=365 · 96.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 10% of answers
Klaviyo firm Klaviyo — ci 0.31–0.46 · n=365 · 87.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 11% of answers
Omnisend firm Omnisend — ci 0.31–0.38 · n=365 · 91.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 7% of answers
Substack gathering Substack — gathering data, n=365. No bootstrap interval yet.
Drip gathering Drip — gathering data, n=365. No bootstrap interval yet.
GetResponse gathering GetResponse — gathering data, n=365. No bootstrap interval yet.
AWeber gathering AWeber — gathering data, n=365. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Brevo

1.00–1.00

MailerLite

0.85–0.92

Sender

0.85–0.92

ConvertKit

0.77–0.77

HubSpot

0.69–0.69

Mailchimp

0.62–0.62

beehiiv

0.54–0.54

EmailOctopus

0.38–0.46

Klaviyo

0.31–0.46

Omnisend

0.31–0.38