AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best email marketing software for small business

MailerLite takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 10 ranked brands, only 7 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Simple, Transparent Pricing - MailerLitewww.mailerlite.commailerlite.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net321
About Brevo's pricing plans – Homehelp.brevo.comhelp.brevo.com/hc/en-us/articles/2…ns?utm=airanks.net316
Marketing Pricing Plans | Constant Contactwww.constantcontact.comconstantcontact.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net175
Mailchimp-Preispläne | Beginnen Sie noch heute | Mailchimpmailchimp.commailchimp.com/pricing/marketing/?utm=airanks.net115
Flexible Pricing Plans for Every Stage of Your Creator Businesskit.comkit.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net92
Klaviyo Pricing Plans | Get Started with Email & SMSwww.klaviyo.comklaviyo.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net64
Creator Plan vs Creator Pro Plan | Kit Help Centerhelp.kit.comhelp.kit.com/en/articles/4494683-c…an?utm=airanks.net61
The Kit Newsletter Plan | Kit Help Centerhelp.kit.comhelp.kit.com/en/articles/9053602-t…an?utm=airanks.net57
Omnisend Pricing Plans 2026 | Omnisend Help Centersupport.omnisend.comsupport.omnisend.com/en/articles/3…26?utm=airanks.net55
Marketing Software Pricing | HubSpotwww.hubspot.comhubspot.com/pricing/marketing?utm=airanks.net52

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

MailerLite locked MailerLite — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=376 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 96% of answers
Brevo locked Brevo — ci 0.89–0.89 · n=376 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
Constant Contact locked Constant Contact — ci 0.78–0.78 · n=376 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 85% of answers
Klaviyo locked Klaviyo — ci 0.67–0.67 · n=376 · 99.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 58% of answers
ConvertKit locked ConvertKit — ci 0.56–0.56 · n=376 · 99.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 72% of answers
Active Campaign soft Active Campaign — ci 0.33–0.44 · n=376 · 71.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 52% of answers
Omnisend contested Omnisend — ci 0.22–0.44 · n=376 · 62.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 33% of answers
Mailchimp firm Mailchimp — ci 0.11–0.33 · n=376 · 85.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 40% of answers
HubSpot locked HubSpot — ci 0.11–0.22 · n=376 · 97.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 33% of answers
GetResponse gathering GetResponse — gathering data, n=376. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

MailerLite

1.00–1.00

Brevo

0.89–0.89

Constant Contact

0.78–0.78

Klaviyo

0.67–0.67

ConvertKit

0.56–0.56

Active Campaign

0.33–0.44

Omnisend

0.22–0.44

Mailchimp

0.11–0.33

HubSpot

0.11–0.22

9 of 10 brands measured · 8 dominance edges · 7 rungs · 5 pairs the data does not separate