AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best free email marketing platforms

Brevo takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 13 ranked brands, only 9 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Simple, Transparent Pricing - MailerLitewww.mailerlite.commailerlite.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net206
Mailchimp Pricing Plans | Get Started Today | Mailchimpmailchimp.commailchimp.com/pricing/marketing/?utm=airanks.net190
FAQs - What are the limits of the Free plan? – Homehelp.brevo.comhelp.brevo.com/hc/en-us/articles/2…an?utm=airanks.net184
Free Email Marketing Service | Start Your Free Forever Plan Todaywww.sender.netsender.net/free-email-marketing/?utm=airanks.net107
Email Marketing Software & Free Campaign Tools | HubSpotwww.hubspot.comhubspot.com/products/marketing/email?utm=airanks.net80
Pricing - beehiiv — The newsletter platform built for growthwww.beehiiv.combeehiiv.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net75

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Brevo locked Brevo — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=376 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
MailerLite soft MailerLite — ci 0.83–0.92 · n=376 · 74.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 94% of answers
Sender soft Sender — ci 0.83–0.92 · n=376 · 74.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 64% of answers
ConvertKit locked ConvertKit — ci 0.75–0.75 · n=376 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 90% of answers
HubSpot locked HubSpot — ci 0.67–0.67 · n=376 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 75% of answers
Mailchimp locked Mailchimp — ci 0.58–0.58 · n=376 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 58% of answers
beehiiv locked beehiiv — ci 0.50–0.50 · n=376 · 99.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 26% of answers
EmailOctopus locked EmailOctopus — ci 0.42–0.42 · n=376 · 99.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 15% of answers
Omnisend firm Omnisend — ci 0.25–0.33 · n=376 · 85.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 13% of answers
Klaviyo firm Klaviyo — ci 0.25–0.33 · n=376 · 85.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 10% of answers
GetResponse firm GetResponse — ci 0.00–0.17 · n=376 · 87.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 1% of answers
AWeber gathering AWeber — gathering data, n=376. No bootstrap interval yet.
Substack gathering Substack — gathering data, n=376. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Brevo

1.00–1.00

MailerLite

0.83–0.92

Sender

0.83–0.92

ConvertKit

0.75–0.75

HubSpot

0.67–0.67

Mailchimp

0.58–0.58

beehiiv

0.50–0.50

EmailOctopus

0.42–0.42

Omnisend

0.25–0.33

Klaviyo

0.25–0.33

GetResponse

0.00–0.17