AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best headphones for running a marathon

Shokz takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 10 ranked brands, only 3 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Shop Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 Best Bone Conduction Headphones for Sportsshokz.comshokz.com/products/openrunpro2?utm=airanks.net147
Bone Conduction Headphones for Sports & Active Use – Shokzshokz.comshokz.com/pages/openrunpro2.html?utm=airanks.net109
Buy Shokz OpenRun Running Headphones - Perfect for Sports & Runningshokz.comshokz.com/products/openrun?utm=airanks.net100
Shop Ultra Open Earbuds | Bluetooth Open Earbuds | Bosewww.bose.combose.com/p/earbuds/bose-ultra-open…ml?utm=airanks.net80
Introducing Open-Ear Audio with Ultra Open Earbuds | Bosewww.bose.combose.com/pressroom/bose-ultra-open…ds?utm=airanks.net80
Shokz OpenRun - Open-Ear Bone Conduction Headphones for Runningshokz.comshokz.com/pages/openrun?utm=airanks.net76
Best Open-Ear Headphones for Running (2026) | Safer, Comfortable Fit | Shokzshokz.comshokz.com/blogs/news/open-ear-head…ng?utm=airanks.net76
Powerbeats Pro 2 - Beats by Drewww.beatsbydre.combeatsbydre.com/support/earbuds/pow…-2?utm=airanks.net66
Powerbeats Pro 2 – Wireless Sport Earbuds with Ear Hooks - Beatswww.beatsbydre.combeatsbydre.com/earbuds/powerbeats-pro-2?utm=airanks.net58
Shop Shokz OpenFit Pro Noise Reduction Open Earbuds for Gymshokz.comshokz.com/products/openfit-pro?utm=airanks.net55

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Shokz locked Shokz — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=406 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
Beats locked Beats — ci 0.89–0.89 · n=406 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 55% of answers
Bose locked Bose — ci 0.78–0.78 · n=406 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 40% of answers
JBL contested JBL — ci 0.56–0.67 · n=406 · 56.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 11% of answers
Apple contested Apple — ci 0.56–0.67 · n=406 · 56.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 13% of answers
Jabra contested Jabra — ci 0.11–0.44 · n=406 · 63.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Anker unsettled Anker — ci 0.00–0.44 · n=406 · 33.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
JLab unsettled JLab — ci 0.00–0.44 · n=406 · 34.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Nothing unsettled Nothing — ci 0.00–0.44 · n=406 · 32.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Sony gathering Sony — gathering data, n=406. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Shokz

1.00–1.00

Beats

0.89–0.89

Bose

0.78–0.78

JBL

0.56–0.67

Apple

0.56–0.67

Jabra

0.11–0.44

Anker

0.00–0.44

JLab

0.00–0.44

Nothing

0.00–0.44

9 of 10 brands measured · 12 dominance edges · 5 rungs · 7 pairs the data does not separate