AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best headphones for running and biking

Shokz takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 9 ranked brands, only 5 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Shop Ultra Open Earbuds | Bluetooth Open Earbuds | Bosewww.bose.combose.com/p/earbuds/bose-ultra-open…ml?utm=airanks.net156
Shop Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 Best Bone Conduction Headphones for Sportsshokz.comshokz.com/products/openrunpro2?utm=airanks.net142
Introducing Open-Ear Audio with Ultra Open Earbuds | Bosewww.bose.combose.com/pressroom/bose-ultra-open…ds?utm=airanks.net119
Buy Shokz OpenRun Running Headphones - Perfect for Sports & Runningshokz.comshokz.com/products/openrun?utm=airanks.net98
The 6 Best Bone Conduction And Open-Ear Headphones of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…ar?utm=airanks.net89
The best running headphones 2026: top audio for running | TechRadarwww.techradar.comtechradar.com/best/best-running-he…es?utm=airanks.net76
The 6 Best Headphones And Earbuds For Running And Working Out of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…ng?utm=airanks.net64
Shop Shokz OpenFit Pro Noise Reduction Open Earbuds for Gymshokz.comshokz.com/products/openfit-pro?utm=airanks.net63

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Shokz locked Shokz — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=409 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
Bose locked Bose — ci 0.88–0.88 · n=409 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 86% of answers
Beats locked Beats — ci 0.75–0.75 · n=409 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 28% of answers
Anker firm Anker — ci 0.50–0.63 · n=409 · 88.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 10% of answers
Nothing firm Nothing — ci 0.50–0.63 · n=409 · 87.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Apple contested Apple — ci 0.12–0.38 · n=409 · 58.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
Sony unsettled Sony — ci 0.00–0.38 · n=409 · 44.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
EarFun unsettled EarFun — ci 0.00–0.38 · n=409 · 42.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 1% of answers
JLab contested JLab — ci 0.00–0.25 · n=409 · 61.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 1% of answers

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Shokz

1.00–1.00

Bose

0.88–0.88

Beats

0.75–0.75

Anker

0.50–0.63

Nothing

0.50–0.63

Apple

0.12–0.38

Sony

0.00–0.38

EarFun

0.00–0.38

JLab

0.00–0.25