AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best headphones for teams meetings

Jabra takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 9 ranked brands, only 5 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Phones and Devices for Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Learnlearn.microsoft.comlearn.microsoft.com/en-us/Microsof…es?utm=airanks.net323
Buy Zone Wireless 2 Headset for Business | Logitechwww.logitech.comlogitech.com/en-us/products/headse…ml?utm=airanks.net241
HP Poly Voyager Focus 2 - Stereo Bluetooth Headset | HP® Official Sitewww.hp.comhp.com/us-en/poly/headsets/bluetoo…ml?utm=airanks.net165
Jabra Evolve2 65 Flex | Overviewwww.jabra.comjabra.com/business/office-headsets…ex?utm=airanks.net141
Evolve3 85 | Voice Clarity & Immersive Focus for Modern Workwww.jabra.comjabra.com/en-ca/business/office-he…85?utm=airanks.net85
Use Microsoft Modern USB-C Headset in Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Supportsupport.microsoft.comsupport.microsoft.com/en-us/surfac…ms?utm=airanks.net67
Jabra Evolve3 85 review: The king of conferencing headsets | Tom's Guidewww.tomsguide.comtomsguide.com/computing/peripheral…ew?utm=airanks.net67
Zone Wireless 2 - Premium Business Headset | Logitechwww.logitech.comlogitech.com/en-us/products/headse…ml?utm=airanks.net58
Use certified devices to help manage calls and meetings in Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Supportsupport.microsoft.comsupport.microsoft.com/en-US/teams/…ms?utm=airanks.net58
Microsoft Teams enabled deviceswww.microsoft.commicrosoft.com/en-us/teams-devices/…36?utm=airanks.net47

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Jabra locked Jabra — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=408 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 98% of answers
Logitech locked Logitech — ci 0.88–0.88 · n=408 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 94% of answers
Plantronics locked Plantronics — ci 0.75–0.75 · n=408 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 78% of answers
Sony firm Sony — ci 0.50–0.63 · n=408 · 83.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 9% of answers
Bose firm Bose — ci 0.50–0.63 · n=408 · 83.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 7% of answers
Apple gathering Apple — gathering data, n=408. No bootstrap interval yet.
Sennheiser gathering Sennheiser — gathering data, n=408. No bootstrap interval yet.
Beats gathering Beats — gathering data, n=408. No bootstrap interval yet.
Shokz gathering Shokz — gathering data, n=408. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Jabra

1.00–1.00

Logitech

0.88–0.88

Plantronics

0.75–0.75

Sony

0.50–0.63

Bose

0.50–0.63

5 of 9 brands measured · 4 dominance edges · 4 rungs · 1 pair the data does not separate