AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best headphones for work calls

Jabra takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 14 ranked brands, only 5 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 6 Best Headphones For Work of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…ce?utm=airanks.net165
Jabra Evolve2 65 Flex | Overviewwww.jabra.comjabra.com/business/office-headsets…ex?utm=airanks.net143
Buy Zone Wireless 2 Headset for Business | Logitechwww.logitech.comlogitech.com/en-us/products/headse…ml?utm=airanks.net139
Best noise canceling headphones for work in 2026 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/best-noise-cancellin…7/?utm=airanks.net83
Best headphones with mic for conference calls- SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/best-bluetooth-headp…7/?utm=airanks.net74
TechRadarwww.techradar.comtechradar.com/news/the-best-blueto…ts?utm=airanks.net71
Voyager FOCUS2 series - Specifications & Accessories | HP® Supportsupport.hp.comsupport.hp.com/us-en/product/produ…68?utm=airanks.net67
Zone Wireless 2 - Premium Business Headset | Logitechwww.logitech.comlogitech.com/en-us/products/headse…ml?utm=airanks.net58
The 6 Best Bluetooth Headsets For Phone Calls of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…ls?utm=airanks.net54
Jabra Evolve3 85 review: The king of conferencing headsets | Tom's Guidewww.tomsguide.comtomsguide.com/computing/peripheral…ew?utm=airanks.net49

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Jabra locked Jabra — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=405 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 98% of answers
Sony locked Sony — ci 0.92–0.92 · n=405 · 99.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 95% of answers
Logitech locked Logitech — ci 0.85–0.85 · n=405 · 99.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 65% of answers
Plantronics locked Plantronics — ci 0.77–0.77 · n=405 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 46% of answers
Bose soft Bose — ci 0.62–0.69 · n=405 · 70.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 25% of answers
Apple soft Apple — ci 0.62–0.69 · n=405 · 70.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 27% of answers
Anker locked Anker — ci 0.54–0.54 · n=405 · 99.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 14% of answers
Razer soft Razer — ci 0.38–0.46 · n=405 · 77.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
Shokz soft Shokz — ci 0.38–0.46 · n=405 · 76.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Sennheiser Momentum gathering Sennheiser Momentum — gathering data, n=405. No bootstrap interval yet.
Sennheiser gathering Sennheiser — gathering data, n=405. No bootstrap interval yet.
JBL gathering JBL — gathering data, n=405. No bootstrap interval yet.
Nothing gathering Nothing — gathering data, n=405. No bootstrap interval yet.
Beats gathering Beats — gathering data, n=405. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Jabra

1.00–1.00

Sony

0.92–0.92

Logitech

0.85–0.85

Plantronics

0.77–0.77

Bose

0.62–0.69

Apple

0.62–0.69

Anker

0.54–0.54

Razer

0.38–0.46

Shokz

0.38–0.46

9 of 14 brands measured · 9 dominance edges · 7 rungs · 2 pairs the data does not separate