AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best running shoes for plantar fasciitis for women

Brooks takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 7 ranked brands, only 4 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

GEL-KAYANO 32 | Women | Black/White | Running Shoes | ASICS United Stateswww.asics.comasics.com/us/en-us/gel-kayano-32/p…ml?utm=airanks.net121
Plantar Fasciitis and Bone Spurs - OrthoInfo - AAOSorthoinfo.aaos.orgorthoinfo.aaos.org/en/diseases--co…rs?utm=airanks.net90
10 Best Women’s Running Shoes for Plantar Fasciitiswww.verywellfit.comverywellfit.com/best-womens-runnin…97?utm=airanks.net83
Plantar fasciitis - Diagnosis and treatment - Mayo Clinicwww.mayoclinic.orgmayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions…51?utm=airanks.net75
Women's Adrenaline GTS 25 Running Shoes | Brooks Runningwww.brooksrunning.combrooksrunning.com/en_us/womens/sho…ml?utm=airanks.net62
GEL-KAYANO 32 | Women | Bluebell/Pure Silver | Running Shoes | ASICS United Stateswww.asics.comasics.com/us/en-us/gel-kayano-32/p…ml?utm=airanks.net52
GEL-KAYANO Stability Running Shoes | ASICS USwww.asics.comasics.com/us/en-us/gel-kayano/c/aa…n/?utm=airanks.net52
The 10 Best Running Shoes for Plantar Fasciitis, According to Podiatristswww.shape.comshape.com/fitness/gear/best-runnin…is?utm=airanks.net45
Best Women's Running Shoes 2026: Podiatrist Picks | DPM | DPMwww.michiganfootdoctors.commichiganfootdoctors.com/womens-run…s/?utm=airanks.net45
SPORT-SPECIFIC SHOES CANwww.apma.orgapma.org/apmamain/document-server/?utm=airanks.net37

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Brooks locked Brooks — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=398 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 97% of answers
Hoka contested Hoka — ci 0.67–0.83 · n=398 · 59.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 89% of answers
Asics contested Asics — ci 0.67–0.83 · n=398 · 59.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 94% of answers
New Balance locked New Balance — ci 0.50–0.50 · n=398 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 63% of answers
Saucony locked Saucony — ci 0.33–0.33 · n=398 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 45% of answers
Altra firm Altra — ci 0.00–0.17 · n=398 · 93.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Nike gathering Nike — gathering data, n=398. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Brooks

1.00–1.00

Hoka

0.67–0.83

Asics

0.67–0.83

New Balance

0.50–0.50

Saucony

0.33–0.33

Altra

0.00–0.17

6 of 7 brands measured · 6 dominance edges · 5 rungs · 1 pair the data does not separate