AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best sneakers for balance and stability

Brooks takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 13 ranked brands, only 7 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 6 Best Stability Running Shoes of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/running-shoes/reviews/b…ty?utm=airanks.net141
The 9 Best Stability Running Shoes of 2026 - Shoes for Overpronationwww.runnersworld.comrunnersworld.com/gear/a20865766/be…s/?utm=airanks.net117
7 Best Stability Walking Shoes in 2026 | RunRepeatrunrepeat.comrunrepeat.com/guides/best-stabilit…es?utm=airanks.net113
Fresh Foam X 860v14 - New Balancewww.newbalance.comnewbalance.com/pd/fresh-foam-x-860…ml?utm=airanks.net79
The 11 Best Stability Running Shoes of 2026www.outsideonline.comoutsideonline.com/outdoor-gear/run…s/?utm=airanks.net71
Hurricane 25 Men’s Cushioned Stability Shoe | Saucony USwww.saucony.comsaucony.com/en/hurricane-25/60323M.html?utm=airanks.net65
Best Stability Running Shoes 2026 | Buyer's Guidewww.fleetfeet.comfleetfeet.com/running-shoe-buyers-…ty?utm=airanks.net53
Fresh Foam X 860v15 - New Balancewww.newbalance.comnewbalance.com/pd/fresh-foam-x-860…ml?utm=airanks.net45
Men's Adrenaline GTS 25 Running Shoes | Brooks Runningwww.brooksrunning.combrooksrunning.com/en_us/mens/shoes…ml?utm=airanks.net45
GT-2000 Stability Running Shoes | ASICS USwww.asics.comasics.com/us/en-us/gt-2000/c/aa501…s/?utm=airanks.net41

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Brooks locked Brooks — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=404 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 99% of answers
Asics locked Asics — ci 0.92–0.92 · n=404 · 99.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 97% of answers
New Balance locked New Balance — ci 0.83–0.83 · n=404 · 99.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 84% of answers
Saucony locked Saucony — ci 0.75–0.75 · n=404 · 98.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 46% of answers
Hoka locked Hoka — ci 0.67–0.67 · n=404 · 97.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 43% of answers
Nike locked Nike — ci 0.58–0.58 · n=404 · 99.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 33% of answers
Topo Athletic contested Topo Athletic — ci 0.42–0.50 · n=404 · 50.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 14% of answers
Reebok contested Reebok — ci 0.42–0.50 · n=404 · 50.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 17% of answers
Salomon locked Salomon — ci 0.25–0.33 · n=404 · 97.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
Adidas soft Adidas — ci 0.17–0.33 · n=404 · 73.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Altra soft Altra — ci 0.17–0.25 · n=404 · 75.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Vionic gathering Vionic — gathering data, n=404. No bootstrap interval yet.
Puma gathering Puma — gathering data, n=404. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Brooks

1.00–1.00

Asics

0.92–0.92

New Balance

0.83–0.83

Saucony

0.75–0.75

Hoka

0.67–0.67

Nike

0.58–0.58

Topo Athletic

0.42–0.50

Reebok

0.42–0.50

Salomon

0.25–0.33

Adidas

0.17–0.33

Altra

0.17–0.25

11 of 13 brands measured · 13 dominance edges · 8 rungs · 4 pairs the data does not separate