AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best suv for family

Toyota takes the top spot in 79.7% of resamples. Of 15 ranked brands, only 4 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

2026 Honda Pilot - Off-Road Capable Full-Size Family SUVautomobiles.honda.comautomobiles.honda.com/pilot?utm=airanks.net117
2026 Toyota Grand Highlander - Toyota USA Newsroompressroom.toyota.compressroom.toyota.com/vehicle/2026-…r/?utm=airanks.net105
Best Family SUVs with 3 Rows for 2026 - iSeeCars.comwww.iseecars.comiseecars.com/family-cars/suvs-with…ws?utm=airanks.net74
2026 Toyota Grand Highlander | Toyota.comwww.toyota.comtoyota.com/grandhighlander/?utm=airanks.net53
Battle of the family SUVs: Hyundai Palisade vs Kia Tellurideapnews.comapnews.com/article/2bb7ecbd55d902a…7c?utm=airanks.net44
The 5 best midsize three-row SUVs, according to Edmunds | AP Newsapnews.comapnews.com/article/a037a0e9845602d…30?utm=airanks.net43
2026 Palisade Hybrid | Three-Row Midsize SUV | Hyundai USAwww.hyundaiusa.comhyundaiusa.com/us/en/vehicles/pali…id?utm=airanks.net33

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Toyota soft Toyota — ci 0.93–1.00 · n=400 · 79.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 95% of answers
Honda soft Honda — ci 0.93–1.00 · n=400 · 79.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 95% of answers
Hyundai locked Hyundai — ci 0.86–0.86 · n=400 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 75% of answers
Kia locked Kia — ci 0.79–0.79 · n=400 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 52% of answers
Nissan soft Nissan — ci 0.64–0.71 · n=400 · 72.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 18% of answers
Subaru soft Subaru — ci 0.64–0.71 · n=400 · 71.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 15% of answers
Ford firm Ford — ci 0.50–0.57 · n=400 · 91.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 11% of answers
Chevrolet soft Chevrolet — ci 0.43–0.57 · n=400 · 70.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 9% of answers
Mazda soft Mazda — ci 0.43–0.50 · n=400 · 72.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
Volvo locked Volvo — ci 0.36–0.36 · n=400 · 97.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
Acura gathering Acura — gathering data, n=400. No bootstrap interval yet.
Volkswagen gathering Volkswagen — gathering data, n=400. No bootstrap interval yet.
Lexus gathering Lexus — gathering data, n=400. No bootstrap interval yet.
Chrysler gathering Chrysler — gathering data, n=400. No bootstrap interval yet.
Rivian gathering Rivian — gathering data, n=400. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Toyota

0.93–1.00

Honda

0.93–1.00

Hyundai

0.86–0.86

Kia

0.79–0.79

Nissan

0.64–0.71

Subaru

0.64–0.71

Ford

0.50–0.57

Chevrolet

0.43–0.57

Mazda

0.43–0.50

Volvo

0.36–0.36