AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content
AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service
questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish
what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and
which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10
(a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data),
with the methodology in the open.
01Honda■■■ locked Honda — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=397 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 97% of answers
02Hyundai■■■ locked Hyundai — ci 0.96–0.96 · n=397 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 99% of answers
03Toyota■■■ locked Toyota — ci 0.93–0.93 · n=397 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 95% of answers
04Kia■■■ locked Kia — ci 0.89–0.89 · n=397 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 94% of answers
05Chevrolet□□□ contested Chevrolet — ci 0.81–0.85 · n=397 · 62.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 78% of answers
06Subaru□□□ contested Subaru — ci 0.81–0.85 · n=397 · 62.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 68% of answers
07Mazda■■■ locked Mazda — ci 0.74–0.78 · n=397 · 97.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 47% of answers
08BMW■■■ locked BMW — ci 0.74–0.78 · n=397 · 95.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 60% of answers
09Ford■■■ locked Ford — ci 0.70–0.70 · n=397 · 98.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 54% of answers
10Lexus■□□ soft Lexus — ci 0.63–0.67 · n=397 · 70.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 37% of answers
11Genesis■□□ soft Genesis — ci 0.63–0.67 · n=397 · 69.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 33% of answers
12Porsche■□□ soft Porsche — ci 0.56–0.59 · n=397 · 72.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 28% of answers
13Nissan■□□ soft Nissan — ci 0.55–0.59 · n=397 · 70.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 22% of answers
14Tesla■■□ firm Tesla — ci 0.48–0.52 · n=397 · 89.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 19% of answers
15Jeep■□□ soft Jeep — ci 0.44–0.52 · n=397 · 74.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 19% of answers
16Lucid■■□ firm Lucid — ci 0.44–0.48 · n=397 · 80.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 14% of answers
17Volvo□□□ contested Volvo — ci 0.33–0.41 · n=397 · 57.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 7% of answers
18Volkswagen□□□ contested Volkswagen — ci 0.30–0.41 · n=397 · 49.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
19Rivian□□□ contested Rivian — ci 0.22–0.37 · n=397 · 60.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
20Land Rover✕✕✕ unsettled Land Rover — ci 0.15–0.33 · n=397 · 30.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
21GMC✕✕✕ unsettled GMC — ci 0.15–0.33 · n=397 · 24.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
22Cadillac✕✕✕ unsettled Cadillac — ci 0.11–0.33 · n=397 · 25.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
23Mercedes-Benz✕✕✕ unsettled Mercedes-Benz — ci 0.11–0.30 · n=397 · 27.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
24Lincoln✕✕✕ unsettled Lincoln — ci 0.07–0.26 · n=397 · 39.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
25Audi··· gathering Audi — gathering data, n=397. No bootstrap interval yet.
The Incomparability Lattice
what the intervals separate, not what the list claims
An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.
24 of 25 brands measured · 44 dominance edges · 13 rungs · 32 pairs the data does not separate