AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best vpn routers for home

GL.iNet takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 12 ranked brands, only 3 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Aircove Routers for Home & Away | ExpressVPNwww.expressvpn.comexpressvpn.com/aircove?utm=airanks.net53
RT-AX86U Pro|Whole Home Mesh WiFi System|ASUS USAwww.asus.comasus.com/us/networking-iot-servers…o/?utm=airanks.net39
Flint 3 (GL-BE9300) | Tri-band Wi-Fi 7 Home Router — GL.iNetwww.gl-inet.comgl-inet.com/products/gl-be9300/?utm=airanks.net33
Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) | High-Performance VPN Router — GL.iNetwww.gl-inet.comgl-inet.com/products/gl-mt6000/?utm=airanks.net28
Archer BE770 | BE18000 Tri-Band WiFi 7 Router | TP-Linkwww.tp-link.comtp-link.com/us/home-networking/wif…1/?utm=airanks.net26
Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) Wi-Fi 6 High-Performance Home Router — GL.iNetstore.gl-inet.comstore.gl-inet.com/collections/gl-i…er?utm=airanks.net21
Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) | High-Performance VPN Router — GL.iNetwww.gl-inet.comgl-inet.com/en-us/products/gl-mt6000?utm=airanks.net20

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

GL.iNet locked GL.iNet — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=115 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 73% of answers
ASUS locked ASUS — ci 0.91–0.91 · n=115 · 99.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 76% of answers
TP-Link contested TP-Link — ci 0.73–0.82 · n=115 · 55.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 52% of answers
ExpressVPN contested ExpressVPN — ci 0.73–0.82 · n=115 · 55.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 21% of answers
Firewalla firm Firewalla — ci 0.45–0.64 · n=115 · 81.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 20% of answers
NordVPN soft NordVPN — ci 0.36–0.64 · n=115 · 67.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 8% of answers
Mullvad soft Mullvad — ci 0.36–0.55 · n=115 · 67.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 7% of answers
Surfshark contested Surfshark — ci 0.27–0.45 · n=115 · 59.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 8% of answers
ProtonVPN gathering ProtonVPN — gathering data, n=115. No bootstrap interval yet.
eero gathering eero — gathering data, n=115. No bootstrap interval yet.
Ubiquiti gathering Ubiquiti — gathering data, n=115. No bootstrap interval yet.
Google gathering Google — gathering data, n=115. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

GL.iNet

1.00–1.00

ASUS

0.91–0.91

TP-Link

0.73–0.82

ExpressVPN

0.73–0.82

Firewalla

0.45–0.64

NordVPN

0.36–0.64

Mullvad

0.36–0.55

Surfshark

0.27–0.45