AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best vpn wifi router

GL.iNet takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 11 ranked brands, only 3 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Flint 3 (GL-BE9300) | Tri-band Wi-Fi 7 Home Router — GL.iNetwww.gl-inet.comgl-inet.com/products/gl-be9300/?utm=airanks.net33
GL-BE9300 (Flint 3) - GL.iNet Router Docs 4docs.gl-inet.comdocs.gl-inet.com/router/en/4/user_…0/?utm=airanks.net31
Aircove Routers for Home & Away | ExpressVPNwww.expressvpn.comexpressvpn.com/aircove?utm=airanks.net28
Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) | High-Performance VPN Router — GL.iNetwww.gl-inet.comgl-inet.com/en-us/products/gl-mt6000?utm=airanks.net25
RT-BE96U｜WiFi Routers｜ASUS USAwww.asus.comasus.com/us/networking-iot-servers…u/?utm=airanks.net25
Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) | High-Performance VPN Router — GL.iNetwww.gl-inet.comgl-inet.com/products/gl-mt6000/?utm=airanks.net24
GL-MT6000 (Flint 2) - GL.iNet Router Docs 4docs.gl-inet.comdocs.gl-inet.com/router/en/4/user_…0/?utm=airanks.net23
TL-WR3602BE | TP-Link Roam™ 7(BE3600) | TP-Linkwww.tp-link.comtp-link.com/us/home-networking/wif…e/?utm=airanks.net21
VPN on TP-Link Router | Set Up VPN Clientwww.tp-link.comtp-link.com/us/support/faq/3135/?utm=airanks.net21
RT-BE86U｜WiFi Routers｜ASUS USAwww.asus.comasus.com/us/networking-iot-servers…u/?utm=airanks.net20

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

GL.iNet locked GL.iNet — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=114 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 75% of answers
ASUS locked ASUS — ci 0.90–0.90 · n=114 · 99.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 66% of answers
ExpressVPN soft ExpressVPN — ci 0.70–0.80 · n=114 · 72.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 20% of answers
TP-Link soft TP-Link — ci 0.70–0.80 · n=114 · 71.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 31% of answers
NordVPN locked NordVPN — ci 0.60–0.60 · n=114 · 98.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 11% of answers
Mullvad contested Mullvad — ci 0.20–0.50 · n=114 · 45.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
Surfshark contested Surfshark — ci 0.30–0.50 · n=114 · 45.3% of resamples held this rank · named in 9% of answers
ProtonVPN gathering ProtonVPN — gathering data, n=114. No bootstrap interval yet.
Firewalla gathering Firewalla — gathering data, n=114. No bootstrap interval yet.
Netgear gathering Netgear — gathering data, n=114. No bootstrap interval yet.
Ubiquiti gathering Ubiquiti — gathering data, n=114. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

GL.iNet

1.00–1.00

ASUS

0.90–0.90

ExpressVPN

0.70–0.80

TP-Link

0.70–0.80

NordVPN

0.60–0.60

Mullvad

0.20–0.50

Surfshark

0.30–0.50

7 of 11 brands measured · 7 dominance edges · 5 rungs · 2 pairs the data does not separate