AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best walking shoes for obese overweight women

Brooks takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 14 ranked brands, only 6 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Brooks Addiction Walker 2 - Women's Walking Shoeswww.brooksrunning.combrooksrunning.com/en_us/womens/sho…ml?utm=airanks.net98
928v3 - New Balancewww.newbalance.comnewbalance.com/pd/928v3/WW928WB3-B…ml?utm=airanks.net77
7 Best Cushioned Walking Shoes in 2026 | RunRepeatrunrepeat.comrunrepeat.com/guides/best-cushione…es?utm=airanks.net65
Women's Echelon 10 Wide - View All | Sauconywww.saucony.comsaucony.com/en/echelon-10-wide/599…ml?utm=airanks.net58
Brooks Addiction Walker 2 - Women's Walking Shoeswww.brooksrunning.combrooksrunning.com/en_us/womens/sho…ml?utm=airanks.net49
Women's Walking Shoes | Brooks Runningwww.brooksrunning.combrooksrunning.com/en_us/womens/sho…s/?utm=airanks.net44
GEL-KAYANO 32 WIDE | Running Shoes | ASICSwww.asics.comasics.com/us/en-us/gel-kayano-32-w…ml?utm=airanks.net44
GEL-KAYANO 32 | Women | Black/White | Running Shoes | ASICS United Stateswww.asics.comasics.com/us/en-us/gel-kayano-32/p…ml?utm=airanks.net44
The 10 Best Walking Shoes for Women 2026, Tested By Editorswww.womenshealthmag.comwomenshealthmag.com/fitness/g23517…n/?utm=airanks.net42
Women's 928 Walking Shoes - New Balancewww.newbalance.comnewbalance.com/walking-928/womens-…8/?utm=airanks.net36

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Brooks locked Brooks — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=401 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 99% of answers
New Balance locked New Balance — ci 0.92–0.92 · n=401 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 93% of answers
Hoka locked Hoka — ci 0.85–0.85 · n=401 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 77% of answers
Asics locked Asics — ci 0.77–0.77 · n=401 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 72% of answers
Saucony locked Saucony — ci 0.69–0.69 · n=401 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 24% of answers
Skechers locked Skechers — ci 0.62–0.62 · n=401 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 14% of answers
Ryka contested Ryka — ci 0.38–0.54 · n=401 · 57.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Topo Athletic contested Topo Athletic — ci 0.38–0.54 · n=401 · 46.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
Orthofeet contested Orthofeet — ci 0.31–0.54 · n=401 · 61.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
Nike soft Nike — ci 0.23–0.38 · n=401 · 76.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Altra gathering Altra — gathering data, n=401. No bootstrap interval yet.
KEEN gathering KEEN — gathering data, n=401. No bootstrap interval yet.
Reebok gathering Reebok — gathering data, n=401. No bootstrap interval yet.
Vionic gathering Vionic — gathering data, n=401. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Brooks

1.00–1.00

New Balance

0.92–0.92

Hoka

0.85–0.85

Asics

0.77–0.77

Saucony

0.69–0.69

Skechers

0.62–0.62

Ryka

0.38–0.54

Topo Athletic

0.38–0.54

Orthofeet

0.31–0.54

Nike

0.23–0.38

10 of 14 brands measured · 9 dominance edges · 7 rungs · 6 pairs the data does not separate