AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best walking shoes for women

Brooks takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 16 ranked brands, only 8 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 10 Best Walking Shoes for Women 2026, Tested By Editorswww.womenshealthmag.comwomenshealthmag.com/fitness/g23517…n/?utm=airanks.net256
The 8 Best Walking Shoes of 2026 - Most Comfortable Shoeswww.runnersworld.comrunnersworld.com/gear/a23554492/wa…s/?utm=airanks.net217
The Best Walking Shoes for Women | Tested & Rankedwww.outdoorgearlab.comoutdoorgearlab.com/topics/shoes-an…ns?utm=airanks.net176
9 Best Walking Shoes for Women in 2026, Tested & Reviewedwww.goodhousekeeping.comgoodhousekeeping.com/health-produc…s/?utm=airanks.net98
Best Walking Shoes for Women 2026 | Buyer's Guidewww.fleetfeet.comfleetfeet.com/running-shoe-buyers-…en?utm=airanks.net40
7 Best Walking Shoes For Women in 2026 | RunRepeatrunrepeat.comrunrepeat.com/guides/best-womens-w…es?utm=airanks.net29

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Brooks locked Brooks — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=394 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 97% of answers
Hoka locked Hoka — ci 0.93–0.93 · n=394 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 81% of answers
Asics locked Asics — ci 0.87–0.87 · n=394 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 51% of answers
Altra contested Altra — ci 0.73–0.80 · n=394 · 62.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 46% of answers
New Balance contested New Balance — ci 0.73–0.80 · n=394 · 62.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 44% of answers
Skechers locked Skechers — ci 0.67–0.67 · n=394 · 99.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 56% of answers
On Running locked On Running — ci 0.60–0.60 · n=394 · 99.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 41% of answers
Ryka locked Ryka — ci 0.53–0.53 · n=394 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 15% of answers
Nike locked Nike — ci 0.47–0.47 · n=394 · 99.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 7% of answers
Kizik locked Kizik — ci 0.40–0.40 · n=394 · 97.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 7% of answers
Orthofeet contested Orthofeet — ci 0.13–0.33 · n=394 · 45.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
Salomon unsettled Salomon — ci 0.07–0.33 · n=394 · 33.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
Saucony gathering Saucony — gathering data, n=394. No bootstrap interval yet.
KEEN unsettled KEEN — ci 0.00–0.33 · n=394 · 33.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 1% of answers
Vionic gathering Vionic — gathering data, n=394. No bootstrap interval yet.
Merrell gathering Merrell — gathering data, n=394. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Brooks

1.00–1.00

Hoka

0.93–0.93

Asics

0.87–0.87

Altra

0.73–0.80

New Balance

0.73–0.80

Skechers

0.67–0.67

On Running

0.60–0.60

Ryka

0.53–0.53

Nike

0.47–0.47

Kizik

0.40–0.40

Orthofeet

0.13–0.33

Salomon

0.07–0.33

KEEN

0.00–0.33