AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best walking shoes for women over 60

Brooks takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 13 ranked brands, only 6 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Feet and Footwear for Older Adultswww.cdc.govcdc.gov/steadi/media/pdfs/2024/08/…df?utm=airanks.net213
Verywell Fitwww.verywellfit.comverywellfit.com/best-walking-shoes…01?utm=airanks.net121
Forbeswww.forbes.comforbes.com/sites/forbes-personal-s…n/?utm=airanks.net104
The 10 Best Walking Shoes for Women 2026, Tested By Editorswww.womenshealthmag.comwomenshealthmag.com/fitness/g23517…n/?utm=airanks.net99
9 Best Walking Shoes for Women in 2026, Tested & Reviewedwww.goodhousekeeping.comgoodhousekeeping.com/health-produc…s/?utm=airanks.net87
Balance-Boosting Footwear Tips for Older People - APMA MAINwww.apma.orgapma.org/patients-and-the-public/t…e/?utm=airanks.net75
Women's 928 Walking Shoes - New Balancewww.newbalance.comnewbalance.com/walking-928/womens-…8/?utm=airanks.net56
928v3 - New Balancewww.newbalance.comnewbalance.com/pd/928v3/WW928WB3-B…ml?utm=airanks.net51
The 12 Best Women’s Walking Shoes of 2026www.verywellfit.comverywellfit.com/best-walking-shoes…95?utm=airanks.net49
Women's Adrenaline GTS 25 Running Shoes | Brooks Runningwww.brooksrunning.combrooksrunning.com/en_us/womens/sho…ml?utm=airanks.net41

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Brooks locked Brooks — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=405 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
New Balance locked New Balance — ci 0.92–0.92 · n=405 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 94% of answers
Hoka locked Hoka — ci 0.83–0.83 · n=405 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 77% of answers
Skechers locked Skechers — ci 0.75–0.75 · n=405 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 67% of answers
Asics contested Asics — ci 0.58–0.67 · n=405 · 59.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 20% of answers
Ryka contested Ryka — ci 0.58–0.67 · n=405 · 59.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 22% of answers
Orthofeet locked Orthofeet — ci 0.50–0.50 · n=405 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 15% of answers
Kizik firm Kizik — ci 0.33–0.42 · n=405 · 93.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 7% of answers
Altra unsettled Altra — ci 0.08–0.42 · n=405 · 42.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
Vionic unsettled Vionic — ci 0.08–0.33 · n=405 · 36.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
Nike unsettled Nike — ci 0.08–0.33 · n=405 · 38.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
On Running contested On Running — ci 0.08–0.25 · n=405 · 64.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Topo Athletic gathering Topo Athletic — gathering data, n=405. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Brooks

1.00–1.00

New Balance

0.92–0.92

Hoka

0.83–0.83

Skechers

0.75–0.75

Asics

0.58–0.67

Ryka

0.58–0.67

Orthofeet

0.50–0.50

Kizik

0.33–0.42

Altra

0.08–0.42

Vionic

0.08–0.33

Nike

0.08–0.33

On Running

0.08–0.25

12 of 13 brands measured · 12 dominance edges · 8 rungs · 10 pairs the data does not separate