AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best walking shoes for women with arch support

Brooks takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 12 ranked brands, only 8 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 10 Best Walking Shoes for Women 2026, Tested By Editorswww.womenshealthmag.comwomenshealthmag.com/fitness/g23517…n/?utm=airanks.net240
The 12sauc Best Walking Shoes for High Arches of 2026www.verywellfit.comverywellfit.com/best-walking-shoes…43?utm=airanks.net91
Brooks Addiction Walker 2 - Women's Walking Shoeswww.brooksrunning.combrooksrunning.com/en_us/womens/sho…ml?utm=airanks.net83
our body is unique to you—and that includes your feet! Your foot type, underlyingwww.apma.orgapma.org/apmamain/document-server/?utm=airanks.net58
We Spoke to Podiatrists: These 14 Walking Shoes Are the Best on the Marketwww.prevention.comprevention.com/fitness/workout-clo…n/?utm=airanks.net57
9 Best Walking Shoes for Women in 2026, Tested & Reviewedwww.goodhousekeeping.comgoodhousekeeping.com/health-produc…s/?utm=airanks.net57
Podiatrist-Recommended Shoes for Women 2026 | Top Pickswww.michiganfootdoctors.commichiganfootdoctors.com/podiatrist…s/?utm=airanks.net50
Women's Adrenaline GTS 25 Running Shoes | Brooks Runningwww.brooksrunning.combrooksrunning.com/en_us/womens/sho…ml?utm=airanks.net49

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Brooks locked Brooks — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=394 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
New Balance locked New Balance — ci 0.91–0.91 · n=394 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 97% of answers
Hoka firm Hoka — ci 0.73–0.82 · n=394 · 87.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 85% of answers
Asics firm Asics — ci 0.73–0.82 · n=394 · 87.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 65% of answers
Skechers locked Skechers — ci 0.64–0.64 · n=394 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 52% of answers
Vionic locked Vionic — ci 0.55–0.55 · n=394 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 40% of answers
Orthofeet locked Orthofeet — ci 0.45–0.45 · n=394 · 99.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 9% of answers
Altra firm Altra — ci 0.27–0.36 · n=394 · 81.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
Ryka soft Ryka — ci 0.18–0.36 · n=394 · 71.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Saucony gathering Saucony — gathering data, n=394. No bootstrap interval yet.
Nike gathering Nike — gathering data, n=394. No bootstrap interval yet.
On Running gathering On Running — gathering data, n=394. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Brooks

1.00–1.00

New Balance

0.91–0.91

Hoka

0.73–0.82

Asics

0.73–0.82

Skechers

0.64–0.64

Vionic

0.55–0.55

Orthofeet

0.45–0.45

Altra

0.27–0.36

Ryka

0.18–0.36