AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best web hosting for churches

SiteGround takes the top spot in 83.2% of resamples. Of 12 ranked brands, only 2 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

Subsplash Pricing & Packageswww.subsplash.comsubsplash.com/pricing?utm=airanks.net193
Website Builder | Nucleuswww.nucleus.churchnucleus.church/web?utm=airanks.net126
Hosting for WordPress – Fast, Secure, Managed by Experts - SiteGroundwww.siteground.comsiteground.com/wordpress-hosting.htm?utm=airanks.net105
Pricing | Nucleuswww.nucleus.churchnucleus.church/pricing?utm=airanks.net86
Tithelyget.tithe.lyget.tithe.ly/product/church-websit…er?utm=airanks.net85
All-In-One Church Growth Platform Pricing | ChurchSpringchurchspring.comchurchspring.com/pricing/?utm=airanks.net75
Church Website Builder | ShareFaithwww.sharefaith.comsharefaith.com/church-websites/?utm=airanks.net71
Hosting | WordPress.orgwordpress.orgwordpress.org/hosting/?utm=airanks.net48
Managed Hosting for WordPress: Premium Performance Made Affordable | Hostingerwww.hostinger.comhostinger.com/wordpress-hosting?utm=airanks.net38
Get a Free Custom Website with Hosting | DreamHostwww.dreamhost.comdreamhost.com/offers/free-website/?utm=airanks.net37

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

SiteGround firm SiteGround — ci 0.91–1.00 · n=364 · 83.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 39% of answers
Squarespace soft Squarespace — ci 0.82–1.00 · n=364 · 78.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 37% of answers
DreamHost soft DreamHost — ci 0.64–0.91 · n=364 · 73.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 29% of answers
Wix contested Wix — ci 0.64–0.82 · n=364 · 61.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 28% of answers
Hostinger soft Hostinger — ci 0.64–0.73 · n=364 · 76.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 25% of answers
InterServer locked InterServer — ci 0.55–0.55 · n=364 · 99.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 9% of answers
Bluehost contested Bluehost — ci 0.27–0.45 · n=364 · 60.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
WP Engine unsettled WP Engine — ci 0.18–0.45 · n=364 · 43.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Pressable unsettled Pressable — ci 0.18–0.45 · n=364 · 43.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
GreenGeeks contested GreenGeeks — ci 0.09–0.45 · n=364 · 54.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Namecheap gathering Namecheap — gathering data, n=364. No bootstrap interval yet.
Kinsta gathering Kinsta — gathering data, n=364. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

SiteGround

0.91–1.00

Squarespace

0.82–1.00

DreamHost

0.64–0.91

Wix

0.64–0.82

Hostinger

0.64–0.73

InterServer

0.55–0.55

Bluehost

0.27–0.45

WP Engine

0.18–0.45

Pressable

0.18–0.45

GreenGeeks

0.09–0.45

10 of 12 brands measured · 10 dominance edges · 5 rungs · 13 pairs the data does not separate