AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best wireless earbuds for work calls

Sony takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 17 ranked brands, only 7 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 7 Best Earbuds For Phone Calls of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…ls?utm=airanks.net297
AirPods Pro 3 - Technical Specifications - Applewww.apple.comapple.com/airpods-pro/specs/?utm=airanks.net201
The best earbuds for phone calls in 2026 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/best-earbuds-for-pho…7/?utm=airanks.net150
Tested: Best Cheap Earbuds for Phone Calls - July 2026www.scarbir.comscarbir.com/guide/best-cheap-wirel…ls?utm=airanks.net86
DATA SHEET MICROSOFT TEAMS CERTIFIED EVOLVE2 BUDSwww.jabra.comjabra.com/_/media/Jabra_VXi_Produc…df?utm=airanks.net31

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Sony locked Sony — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 96% of answers
Apple locked Apple — ci 0.94–0.94 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 97% of answers
Jabra locked Jabra — ci 0.88–0.88 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 68% of answers
Bose contested Bose — ci 0.75–0.81 · n=407 · 52.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 41% of answers
Plantronics contested Plantronics — ci 0.75–0.81 · n=407 · 52.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 28% of answers
Anker locked Anker — ci 0.69–0.69 · n=407 · 99.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 31% of answers
CMF locked CMF — ci 0.63–0.63 · n=407 · 99.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 22% of answers
Logitech locked Logitech — ci 0.56–0.56 · n=407 · 99.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 13% of answers
Technics locked Technics — ci 0.50–0.50 · n=407 · 99.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Shokz soft Shokz — ci 0.31–0.44 · n=407 · 70.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
Bang & Olufsen unsettled Bang & Olufsen — ci 0.13–0.44 · n=407 · 36.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 1% of answers
Nothing unsettled Nothing — ci 0.19–0.44 · n=407 · 40.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
EarFun gathering EarFun — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
Beats gathering Beats — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
Sennheiser Momentum gathering Sennheiser Momentum — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
Google gathering Google — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
Sennheiser gathering Sennheiser — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Sony

1.00–1.00

Apple

0.94–0.94

Jabra

0.88–0.88

Bose

0.75–0.81

Plantronics

0.75–0.81

Anker

0.69–0.69

CMF

0.63–0.63

Logitech

0.56–0.56

Technics

0.50–0.50

Shokz

0.31–0.44

Bang & Olufsen

0.13–0.44

Nothing

0.19–0.44