AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best wireless earbuds under $100

EarFun takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 11 ranked brands, only 8 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The best wireless earbuds under $100 in 2026 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/best-wireless-earbud…7/?utm=airanks.net149
The 5 Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds Under $100 of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…0/?utm=airanks.net118
The best wireless earbuds under $100 in 2026 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/best-wireless-earbud…7/?utm=airanks.net111
The best wireless earbuds under $100 in 2026 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/best-wiireless-earbu…7/?utm=airanks.net81
The 5 Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds Under $100 of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…00?utm=airanks.net70
The 7 Best Wireless Earbuds of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…ds?utm=airanks.net70
The best budget earbuds, all real-world tested by our expert audio teamwww.techradar.comtechradar.com/best/the-best-budget…ds?utm=airanks.net40

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

EarFun locked EarFun — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 90% of answers
Anker locked Anker — ci 0.90–0.90 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 88% of answers
CMF locked CMF — ci 0.70–0.80 · n=407 · 95.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 79% of answers
Nothing locked Nothing — ci 0.70–0.80 · n=407 · 95.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 62% of answers
JLab locked JLab — ci 0.60–0.60 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 41% of answers
Sony locked Sony — ci 0.40–0.50 · n=407 · 96.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 22% of answers
Apple locked Apple — ci 0.40–0.50 · n=407 · 96.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 21% of answers
Beats locked Beats — ci 0.30–0.30 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 9% of answers
Skullcandy soft Skullcandy — ci 0.10–0.20 · n=407 · 71.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
JBL soft JBL — ci 0.00–0.20 · n=407 · 68.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Jabra gathering Jabra — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

EarFun

1.00–1.00

Anker

0.90–0.90

CMF

0.70–0.80

Nothing

0.70–0.80

JLab

0.60–0.60

Sony

0.40–0.50

Apple

0.40–0.50

Beats

0.30–0.30

Skullcandy

0.10–0.20

JBL

0.00–0.20