AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best wireless earbuds under 100

EarFun takes the top spot in 90.5% of resamples. Of 12 ranked brands, only 10 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The best wireless earbuds under $100 in 2026 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/best-wireless-earbud…7/?utm=airanks.net189
The 5 Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds Under $100 of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…0/?utm=airanks.net105
The 5 Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds Under $100 of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…00?utm=airanks.net101
The best wireless earbuds under $100 in 2026 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/best-wireless-earbud…7/?utm=airanks.net92
The best wireless earbuds under $100 in 2026 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/best-wiireless-earbu…7/?utm=airanks.net69
The 7 Best Wireless Earbuds of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…ds?utm=airanks.net55
Ear (a) | Audio | Nothing | UScheckout-us.nothing.techcheckout-us.nothing.tech/products/ear-a?utm=airanks.net44
Ear (a) | Audio | Nothing | USus.nothing.techus.nothing.tech/products/ear-a?utm=airanks.net41
CMF Buds 2 Pluscheckout-us.nothing.techcheckout-us.nothing.tech/products/…us?utm=airanks.net41
The best budget earbuds, all real-world tested by our expert audio teamwww.techradar.comtechradar.com/best/the-best-budget…ds?utm=airanks.net37

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

EarFun firm EarFun — ci 0.91–1.00 · n=407 · 90.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 87% of answers
Anker firm Anker — ci 0.91–1.00 · n=407 · 90.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 91% of answers
CMF locked CMF — ci 0.82–0.82 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 85% of answers
Nothing locked Nothing — ci 0.73–0.73 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 59% of answers
JLab locked JLab — ci 0.64–0.64 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 42% of answers
Sony firm Sony — ci 0.45–0.55 · n=407 · 94.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 19% of answers
Apple firm Apple — ci 0.45–0.55 · n=407 · 94.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 20% of answers
Beats locked Beats — ci 0.36–0.36 · n=407 · 99.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 9% of answers
Skullcandy locked Skullcandy — ci 0.27–0.27 · n=407 · 98.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
JBL locked JBL — ci 0.18–0.18 · n=407 · 98.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Bose gathering Bose — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
1MORE gathering 1MORE — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

EarFun

0.91–1.00

Anker

0.91–1.00

CMF

0.82–0.82

Nothing

0.73–0.73

JLab

0.64–0.64

Sony

0.45–0.55

Apple

0.45–0.55

Beats

0.36–0.36

Skullcandy

0.27–0.27

JBL

0.18–0.18

10 of 12 brands measured · 10 dominance edges · 8 rungs · 2 pairs the data does not separate