AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best wireless earbuds under $50

Anker takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 12 ranked brands, only 6 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 4 Best Wireless Earbuds Under $50 of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…50?utm=airanks.net214
The best wireless earbuds under $50 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/the-best-wireless-ea…6/?utm=airanks.net185
soundcore P31i Wireless Earbuds—Deep Bass and Clear Audiowww.soundcore.comsoundcore.com/products/d1202-p31i-…nc?utm=airanks.net98
soundcore P20i Wireless Earbuds - soundcore USwww.soundcore.comsoundcore.com/products/p20i?utm=airanks.net71
The 4 Best Earbuds Under $50 of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…0/?utm=airanks.net66
JLab JBuds Mini True Wireless Bluetooth Earbudswww.jlab.comjlab.com/products/jbuds-mini-true-…ck?utm=airanks.net59
The Best Cheap Wireless Earbuds under $50 - July 2026www.scarbir.comscarbir.com/guide/best-sounding-wi…ar?utm=airanks.net58
soundcore P30i Wireless Earbuds - soundcore USwww.soundcore.comsoundcore.com/products/soundcore-p30i?utm=airanks.net42

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Anker locked Anker — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=411 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 98% of answers
CMF locked CMF — ci 0.91–0.91 · n=411 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 58% of answers
JLab locked JLab — ci 0.82–0.82 · n=411 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 86% of answers
Sony locked Sony — ci 0.73–0.73 · n=411 · 97.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 27% of answers
EarFun locked EarFun — ci 0.64–0.64 · n=411 · 97.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 24% of answers
Nothing soft Nothing — ci 0.36–0.55 · n=411 · 73.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
JBL contested JBL — ci 0.36–0.55 · n=411 · 61.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
Edifier soft Edifier — ci 0.36–0.45 · n=411 · 79.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
TOZO firm TOZO — ci 0.18–0.27 · n=411 · 87.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
Beats soft Beats — ci 0.09–0.27 · n=411 · 76.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Apple soft Apple — ci 0.00–0.18 · n=411 · 67.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Skullcandy gathering Skullcandy — gathering data, n=411. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Anker

1.00–1.00

CMF

0.91–0.91

JLab

0.82–0.82

Sony

0.73–0.73

EarFun

0.64–0.64

Nothing

0.36–0.55

JBL

0.36–0.55

Edifier

0.36–0.45

TOZO

0.18–0.27

Beats

0.09–0.27

Apple

0.00–0.18