AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best wireless earbuds under 50

Anker takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 11 ranked brands, only 7 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 4 Best Wireless Earbuds Under $50 of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…50?utm=airanks.net260
The best wireless earbuds under $50 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/the-best-wireless-ea…6/?utm=airanks.net213
soundcore P31i Wireless Earbuds—Deep Bass and Clear Audiowww.soundcore.comsoundcore.com/products/d1202-p31i-…nc?utm=airanks.net85
The 4 Best Earbuds Under $50 of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…0/?utm=airanks.net83
JLab JBuds Mini True Wireless Bluetooth Earbudswww.jlab.comjlab.com/products/jbuds-mini-true-…ck?utm=airanks.net63
The Best Cheap Wireless Earbuds under $50 - July 2026www.scarbir.comscarbir.com/guide/best-sounding-wi…ar?utm=airanks.net58
soundcore P20i Wireless Earbuds - soundcore USwww.soundcore.comsoundcore.com/products/p20i?utm=airanks.net51
soundcore P30i Wireless Earbuds - soundcore USwww.soundcore.comsoundcore.com/products/soundcore-p30i?utm=airanks.net44
The best budget wireless earbuds for 2026www.engadget.comengadget.com/audio/headphones/best…ml?utm=airanks.net39
CMF Buds 2 | Audio | Nothing | USus.nothing.techus.nothing.tech/products/cmf-buds-2?utm=airanks.net37

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Anker locked Anker — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 97% of answers
CMF firm CMF — ci 0.80–0.90 · n=407 · 90.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 56% of answers
JLab firm JLab — ci 0.80–0.90 · n=407 · 90.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 90% of answers
Sony locked Sony — ci 0.70–0.70 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 27% of answers
EarFun locked EarFun — ci 0.50–0.60 · n=407 · 96.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 20% of answers
Nothing firm Nothing — ci 0.40–0.60 · n=407 · 89.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 10% of answers
JBL soft JBL — ci 0.30–0.50 · n=407 · 71.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 8% of answers
Edifier soft Edifier — ci 0.30–0.40 · n=407 · 76.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 8% of answers
TOZO firm TOZO — ci 0.10–0.20 · n=407 · 94.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
Beats contested Beats — ci 0.00–0.20 · n=407 · 48.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
Apple contested Apple — ci 0.00–0.10 · n=407 · 50.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Anker

1.00–1.00

CMF

0.80–0.90

JLab

0.80–0.90

Sony

0.70–0.70

EarFun

0.50–0.60

Nothing

0.40–0.60

JBL

0.30–0.50

Edifier

0.30–0.40

TOZO

0.10–0.20

Beats

0.00–0.20

Apple

0.00–0.10

11 of 11 brands measured · 17 dominance edges · 6 rungs · 9 pairs the data does not separate