AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best wireless earbuds with microphone for computer & zoom calls

Jabra takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 15 ranked brands, only 8 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 7 Best Earbuds For Phone Calls of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…ls?utm=airanks.net206
AirPods Pro 3 - Technical Specifications - Applewww.apple.comapple.com/airpods-pro/specs/?utm=airanks.net187
The best earbuds for phone calls in 2026 - SoundGuyswww.soundguys.comsoundguys.com/best-earbuds-for-pho…7/?utm=airanks.net116
True wireless earbuds for hybrid working | Evolve2 Budswww.jabra.comjabra.com/business/office-headsets…ds?utm=airanks.net109
EVOLVE2 BUDSwww.jabra.comjabra.com/_/media/Jabra_VXi_Produc…df?utm=airanks.net90
Zoom Workspace Certified Hardwaresupport.zoom.comsupport.zoom.com/hc/en/article?utm=airanks.net72
Voyager Free 60 | HP® Official Sitewww.hp.comhp.com/us-en/solutions/poly/produc…ml?utm=airanks.net60
Buy Zone Wireless 2 Headset for Business | Logitechwww.logitech.comlogitech.com/en-us/products/headse…ml?utm=airanks.net56
Dell Pro Plus Earbuds with AI Noise-Cancelling Mic - EB525​ | Dell USAwww.dell.comdell.com/en-us/shop/dell-pro-plus-…io?utm=airanks.net54
Buy now | Jabra Evolve2 Budswww.jabra.comjabra.com/business/office-headsets…uy?utm=airanks.net51

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Jabra locked Jabra — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 82% of answers
Apple firm Apple — ci 0.86–0.93 · n=407 · 92.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 93% of answers
Plantronics firm Plantronics — ci 0.79–0.93 · n=407 · 88.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 60% of answers
Sony locked Sony — ci 0.79–0.86 · n=407 · 95.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 77% of answers
Logitech locked Logitech — ci 0.71–0.71 · n=407 · 99.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 26% of answers
Anker locked Anker — ci 0.64–0.64 · n=407 · 98.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 23% of answers
CMF locked CMF — ci 0.57–0.57 · n=407 · 96.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 19% of answers
Bose locked Bose — ci 0.50–0.50 · n=407 · 97.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 9% of answers
JLab gathering JLab — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
Technics unsettled Technics — ci 0.21–0.43 · n=407 · 35.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 3% of answers
Shokz unsettled Shokz — ci 0.14–0.43 · n=407 · 31.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 2% of answers
AKG gathering AKG — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
EarFun gathering EarFun — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
Nothing gathering Nothing — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
JBL gathering JBL — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Jabra

1.00–1.00

Apple

0.86–0.93

Plantronics

0.79–0.93

Sony

0.79–0.86

Logitech

0.71–0.71

Anker

0.64–0.64

CMF

0.57–0.57

Bose

0.50–0.50

Technics

0.21–0.43

Shokz

0.14–0.43

10 of 15 brands measured · 11 dominance edges · 7 rungs · 4 pairs the data does not separate