AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

Best wireless headphones for running

Shokz takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 14 ranked brands, only 7 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 6 Best Headphones And Earbuds For Running And Working Out of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/headphones/reviews/best…ng?utm=airanks.net160
The best running headphones 2026: top audio for running | TechRadarwww.techradar.comtechradar.com/best/best-running-he…es?utm=airanks.net149
The 11 Best Running Headphones in 2026 - Best Wireless Earbuds for Runnerswww.runnersworld.comrunnersworld.com/gear/a20852590/th…g/?utm=airanks.net98
Introducing Open-Ear Audio with Ultra Open Earbuds | Bosewww.bose.combose.com/pressroom/bose-ultra-open…ds?utm=airanks.net94
Powerbeats Pro 2 – Wireless Sport Earbuds with Ear Hooks - Beatswww.beatsbydre.combeatsbydre.com/earbuds/powerbeats-pro-2?utm=airanks.net91
Shop Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 Best Bone Conduction Headphones for Sportsshokz.comshokz.com/products/openrunpro2?utm=airanks.net71
Shop Ultra Open Earbuds | Bluetooth Open Earbuds | Bosewww.bose.combose.com/p/earbuds/bose-ultra-open…ml?utm=airanks.net65

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Shokz locked Shokz — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 100% of answers
Beats locked Beats — ci 0.92–0.92 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 96% of answers
Bose locked Bose — ci 0.85–0.85 · n=407 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 58% of answers
JBL firm JBL — ci 0.62–0.77 · n=407 · 80.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 30% of answers
Apple unsettled Apple — ci 0.62–0.77 · n=407 · 41.2% of resamples held this rank · named in 22% of answers
JLab contested JLab — ci 0.62–0.77 · n=407 · 47.7% of resamples held this rank · named in 29% of answers
Jabra locked Jabra — ci 0.54–0.54 · n=407 · 99.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 11% of answers
Nothing firm Nothing — ci 0.38–0.46 · n=407 · 80.4% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
Anker firm Anker — ci 0.38–0.46 · n=407 · 80.6% of resamples held this rank · named in 6% of answers
EarFun contested EarFun — ci 0.15–0.31 · n=407 · 61.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 1% of answers
Sony gathering Sony — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
Skullcandy gathering Skullcandy — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
Sennheiser Momentum gathering Sennheiser Momentum — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.
Sennheiser gathering Sennheiser — gathering data, n=407. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Shokz

1.00–1.00

Beats

0.92–0.92

Bose

0.85–0.85

JBL

0.62–0.77

Apple

0.62–0.77

JLab

0.62–0.77

Jabra

0.54–0.54

Nothing

0.38–0.46

Anker

0.38–0.46

EarFun

0.15–0.31