AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

What is the best blender for smoothies

Vitamix takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 11 ranked brands, only 5 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 5 Best Blenders For Smoothies of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/blender/reviews/best/sm…es?utm=airanks.net403
6 Best Blenders for Smoothies 2026 Reviewed | Food Networkwww.foodnetwork.comfoodnetwork.com/how-to/packages/sh…es?utm=airanks.net239
Best Personal Blenders for Solo Smoothies & Small Jobs (2026) | Bon Appétitwww.bonappetit.combonappetit.com/story/best-personal…rs?utm=airanks.net111
The 5 Best Personal Blenders of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/blender/reviews/best/personal?utm=airanks.net55
This is the best blender in the world, and two trusty, cheaper alternatives | Tom's Guidewww.tomsguide.comtomsguide.com/best-picks/best-blenders?utm=airanks.net42
5200 Getting Started Package - Classic Blenderswww.vitamix.comvitamix.com/us/en_us/products/5200…ed?utm=airanks.net35
7 Best Personal Blenders of 2026, Lab-Tested and Reviewed - Consumer Reportswww.consumerreports.orgconsumerreports.org/appliances/ble…3/?utm=airanks.net35

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

Vitamix locked Vitamix — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=454 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 99% of answers
Ninja locked Ninja — ci 0.90–0.90 · n=454 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 96% of answers
NutriBullet locked NutriBullet — ci 0.80–0.80 · n=454 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 53% of answers
Beast locked Beast — ci 0.70–0.70 · n=454 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 15% of answers
Breville locked Breville — ci 0.60–0.60 · n=454 · 99.9% of resamples held this rank · named in 4% of answers
Hamilton Beach contested Hamilton Beach — ci 0.20–0.50 · n=454 · 49.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 1% of answers
Black+Decker unsettled Black+Decker — ci 0.20–0.50 · n=454 · 42.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 1% of answers
Oster gathering Oster — gathering data, n=454. No bootstrap interval yet.
KitchenAid gathering KitchenAid — gathering data, n=454. No bootstrap interval yet.
Blendtec gathering Blendtec — gathering data, n=454. No bootstrap interval yet.
Braun gathering Braun — gathering data, n=454. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

Vitamix

1.00–1.00

Ninja

0.90–0.90

NutriBullet

0.80–0.80

Beast

0.70–0.70

Breville

0.60–0.60

Hamilton Beach

0.20–0.50

Black+Decker

0.20–0.50