AIRANKS — The Authoritative Rankings for AI Web Content

AIRANKS measures AI visibility: we ask AI models real product and service questions, capture the complete answers as immutable observations, and publish what they contain — which brands were mentioned, which domains were cited, and which exact pages were linked. Every domain gets an AIR score from 1–10 (a decile of visibility in the active dataset; 0 means insufficient data), with the methodology in the open.

AIR

PHRASE

Skip to main content

The Question

← all rankings / dataset COBALT

What is the best gaming monitor

ASUS takes the top spot in 100.0% of resamples. Of 12 ranked brands, only 4 hold a position we'd call firm.

0
answers sampled
0
brands named
1,000
bootstrap resamples

Who AI Cites For This Question

25 cited pages · bars vs the leader

The 6 Best 240Hz Monitors of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/monitor/reviews/best/240hz?utm=airanks.net64
The 6 Best OLED Monitors of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/monitor/reviews/best/oled?utm=airanks.net22
The 7 Best Gaming Monitors of 2026 - RTINGS.comwww.rtings.comrtings.com/monitor/reviews/best/by…g/?utm=airanks.net21
The Best OLED Gaming Monitors 2026 | TechSpotwww.techspot.comtechspot.com/bestof/oled-monitors-26/?utm=airanks.net19
Best gaming monitors in 2026: the pixel-perfect panels I'd buy myself | PC Gamerwww.pcgamer.compcgamer.com/best-gaming-monitor/?utm=airanks.net17
Best gaming monitors 2026: 4K, HDR, best overall, budget, and more | PCWorldwww.pcworld.compcworld.com/article/813301/best-ga…ml?utm=airanks.net16
Best OLED gaming monitors in 2026: I can't keep my eyes off these vivid displays | PC Gamerwww.pcgamer.compcgamer.com/best-oled-gaming-monitor/?utm=airanks.net14
Best Gaming Monitors 2026: Budget, Curved, G-Sync and More | Tom's Hardwarewww.tomshardware.comtomshardware.com/reviews/best-gami…ml?utm=airanks.net12

The Ranking, With Its Uncertainty

ASUS locked ASUS — ci 1.00–1.00 · n=113 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 97% of answers
MSI locked MSI — ci 0.91–0.91 · n=113 · 100.0% of resamples held this rank · named in 58% of answers
Alienware firm Alienware — ci 0.73–0.82 · n=113 · 85.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 35% of answers
Gigabyte contested Gigabyte — ci 0.55–0.82 · n=113 · 48.5% of resamples held this rank · named in 22% of answers
AOC contested AOC — ci 0.64–0.82 · n=113 · 54.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 24% of answers
Dell firm Dell — ci 0.45–0.64 · n=113 · 84.1% of resamples held this rank · named in 14% of answers
LG soft LG — ci 0.18–0.55 · n=113 · 65.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 9% of answers
Samsung unsettled Samsung — ci 0.00–0.45 · n=113 · 32.8% of resamples held this rank · named in 5% of answers
BenQ gathering BenQ — gathering data, n=113. No bootstrap interval yet.
Sony gathering Sony — gathering data, n=113. No bootstrap interval yet.
Acer gathering Acer — gathering data, n=113. No bootstrap interval yet.
HyperX gathering HyperX — gathering data, n=113. No bootstrap interval yet.

The Incomparability Lattice

what the intervals separate, not what the list claims

An edge means one brand's interval sits strictly above another's — zero overlap. No edge between two brands is not a gap in the drawing, it is the finding: their intervals overlap, and the bootstrap cannot tell them apart. Brands on the same rung are incomparable, not tied — the ranking above orders them anyway because a list has to print a total order; this diagram is the honest version.

ASUS

1.00–1.00

MSI

0.91–0.91

Alienware

0.73–0.82

Gigabyte

0.55–0.82

AOC

0.64–0.82

Dell

0.45–0.64

LG

0.18–0.55

Samsung

0.00–0.45